Research, resources, and support for people who want to make disagreements more productive.
Work through a self-guided curriculum on disagreement
Short summaries on disagreement research
Summary: Fogelin argues that some of our disagreements are deep: they cannot be resolved by argument, because the disagreement undercuts the very conditions that make argument possible.
When disagreements are going nowhere,we might try to search for common ground. Doing so is a natural response to deep disagreements. Unfortunately, finding common ground will not always (or even usually) work, and it will not help us resolve deep disagreements, though it may give the illusion of doing so.
Designed to develop reasoning skills that address disagreements' challenges
What does it mean to prove a conclusion? "Proving a conclusion," means showing that the conclusion is a better answer to the argument's implicit question than other serious rival answers.
When events happen they leave behind traces. For example, when a car slams on its breaks to avoid a pedestrian, the skid marks, the smell of burning rubber are left behind. Traces give us reasons to think that an event happened, because the event happening could explain why the traces are there.
Correlations, when two events happen together, lead us to wonder if the events are causally connected. Causal stories that elaborate how one event is causally related to another, explain why events happen together.